[ Home ]  [ Biblical Stuff ]  [ Biblical Versification ]  [ Eusebian Canons ]  [ Jerome, Letter to Pope Damasus ]


Letter of Jerome to Pope Damasus


To the blessed Pope Damasus, from Jerome,

You urge me to make a new work from the old, and that I might sit as a kind of judge over the versions
of Scripture dispersed throughout the whole world, and that I might resolve which among such vary, and 
which of these they may be which truly agree with the Greek. Pious work, yet perilous presumption, to 
change the old and aging language of the world , to carry it back to infancy, for to judge others is to invite 
judging by all of them. Is there indeed any learned or unlearned man, who when he picks up the volume 
in his hand, and takes a single taste of it, and sees what he will have read to differ, might not instantly 
raise his voice, calling me a forger, proclaiming me now to be a sacrilegious man, that I might dare to add, 
to change, or to correct anything in the old books? Against such infamy I am consoled by two causes: that 
it is you, who are the highest priest, who so orders, and truth is not to be what might vary, as even now I 
am vindicated by the witness of slanderers. If indeed faith is administered by the Latin version, they might 
respond by which, for they are nearly as many as the books! If, however, truth is to be a seeking among 
many, why do we not now return to the Greek originals to correct those mistakes which either through faulty 
translators were set forth, or through confident but unskilled were wrongly revised, or through sleeping scribes 
either were added or were changed? Certainly, I do not discuss the Old Testament, which came from the 
Seventy Elders in the Greek language, changing in three steps until it arrived with us [Hebrew > Greek > Latin]. 
Nor do I seek what Aquila, or what Symmachus may think, or why Theodotion may walk the middle of the road 
between old and new. This may be the true translation which the Apostles have approved. I now speak of the 
New Testament, which is undoubtedly Greek, except the Apostle Matthew, who had first set forth the Gospel 
of Christ in Hebrew letters in Judea. This (Testament) certainly differs in our language, and is led in the way of 
different streams; it is necessary to seek the single fountainhead. I pass over those books which are called by 
the name of Lucian and Hesychius, for which a few men wrongly claim authority, who anyway were not allowed 
to revise either in the Old Instrument after the Seventy Translators, or to pour out revisions in the New; with the 
Scriptures previously translated into the languages of many nations, the additions may now be shown to be false.

Therefore, this present little preface promises only the four Gospels, the order of which is Matthew, Mark, Luke, 
John, revised in comparison with only old Greek books. They do not disagree with many familiar Latin readings, 
as we have kept our pen in control, but only those in which the sense will have been seen to have changed (from 
the Greek) are corrected; the rest remain as they have been.

We have also copied the lists which Eusebius the bishop of Caesarea, following Ammonius of Alexandria, set 
out in ten numbers, as they are had in the Greek, so that if any may then wish through diligence to make known 
what in the Gospels may be either the same, or similar, or singular, he may learn their differences. This is great, 
since indeed error has sunk into our books; while concerning the same thing, one Evangelist has said more, 
into another they have added because they thought it inferior; or while another has differently expressed the 
same sense, whichever one of the four he had read first, he will revise the other to the version he values most. 
Whence it happened how in our time that all have been mixed; in Mark are many things of Luke, and even of 
Matthew; turned backwards in Matthew are many things of John and of Mark, yet in the remaining others, they 
are found to be correct. When, therefore, you will have read the lists which are attached below, the confusion 
of errors is removed, and you will know all the similar passages, and the singular ones, wherever you may turn 
to. In the first list, the four agree, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John; in the second, three, Matthew, Mark, Luke; in 
the third, three, Matthew, Luke, John; in the fourth, three, Matthew, Mark, John; in the fifth, two, Matthew, Luke; 
in the sixth, two, Matthew, Mark; in the seventh, two, Matthew, John; in the eighth, two, Luke, Mark; in the ninth, 
two, Luke, John; in the tenth some peculiar ones are given which the others don't have. Separately in the Gospels 
are numbered sections of unequal length, beginning with one and increasing to the end of the books. This is 
written before the passage in black, and it has under it a red number, which shows to which of the ten (lists) to 
proceed, with the first number to be sought in the list. Therefore, when the book is open, for example, if you will 
wish to know of this or that chapter in which list they may be, you will immediately be shown by the lower number.
Returning to the beginning (of the book) in which the different lists are brought together, and immediately finding 
the same lists by the title in front, by that same number which you had sought in the Evangelist, which you will 
find marked in the inscription, you may also view other similar passages, the numbers of which you may note 
there. And when you know them, you will return to the single volumes, and immediately finding the number which 
you will have noted before, you will learn the places in which either the same things or similar things were said.

I wish that in Christ you may be well, and that you will remember me, most blessed Pope.




translated by Kevin P. Edgecomb,as far as I am able to find, this is the first translation of the full letter into 
English, modern or otherwise.  27 July 1999, Berkeley, California